肝细胞系中DNA甲基化与组蛋白修饰协同调控指数的构建及应用分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.内蒙古大学物理科学与技术学院生物物理与生物信息学自治区重点实验室,呼和浩特010021;2.#)内蒙古大学草地家畜生殖调控与繁育国家重点实验室,呼和浩特010021

作者简介:

CHEN Ying-Li. Tel: 86-471-4992914, E-mail: stchenyl@imu.edu.cn陈颖丽 Tel:0471-4992914,E-mail:stchenyl@imu.edu.cn李前忠 Tel:0471-4993141,E-mail:qzli@imu.edu.cn

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(62361047,32160216,62561042)资助项目。


Construction and Application of a Co-regulation Index for DNA Methylation and Histone Modifications in Hepatic Cell Lines
Author:
Affiliation:

1)Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Biophysics and Bioinformatics, School of Physical Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia University, Hohho 010021, China;2)The State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China

Fund Project:

This work was supported by grants from The National Natural Science Foundation of China (62361047, 32160216, 62561042).

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 采用HepG2细胞系和体外分化肝细胞,探究DNA甲基化和组蛋白修饰对基因表达的协同作用,并识别组蛋白的关键修饰和共调控区域。方法 收集并分析了来自HepG2和体外分化肝细胞的组蛋白的11种修饰、DNA甲基化和基因表达数据,识别了在启动子区域与基因表达变化相关的DNA甲基化关键位点。基于DNA甲基化关键位点及其侧翼组蛋白修饰信号的差异特征,本文使用了XGBoost算法预测了在HepG2细胞系中相对于体外分化肝细胞的上调和下调基因。此外,本文提出了DNA甲基化和组蛋白修饰的协同调控指数,以定量评估它们的协同作用,并整合临床数据识别了与生存相关的基因及其关键共调控区域。结果 结合H3K4me3、H3K9ac、H3K27ac和DNA甲基化水平的预测模型对基因表达变化的预测性能达到了较高的水平(AUC=0.900 9),引入协同调控指数之后,预测性能进一步提高(AUC=0.928 7)。此外,使用协同调控指数还确定了2个与生存相关的基因及其关键共调控区域。结论 在HepG2细胞系和体外分化肝细胞中,H3K4me3、H3K9ac、H3K27ac与DNA甲基化表现出较强的协同作用,所提出的协同调控指数有助于识别关键的共调控区域。这些发现将有助于在癌症研究中,进一步分析和理解DNA甲基化和组蛋白修饰的协同调控机制。

    Abstract:

    Objective DNA methylation and histone modifications jointly regulate gene expression. In this study, co-regulation refers to their combined contribution to gene expression changes. We analyzed multi-omics data from HepG2 cells and in vitro differentiated hepatocytes. This study aimed to identify key DNA methylation sites and histone modifications. A further aim was to construct a co-regulation index to quantify their combined contribution on gene expression.Methods We collected ChIP-seq data for 11 histone modifications, whole-genome bisulfite sequencing data, and poly(A)+ RNA-seq data from the ENCODE database. Differentially expressed genes and differentially methylated CpG sites were identified by using DESeq2 and methylKit. The promoter regions were defined as 2 000 bp upstream and 2 000 bp downstream of the transcription start site. It was divided into 80 bins of 50 bp. Bins 3 to 12 flanking transcription start site were selected as candidate bins. The methylation differences between HepG2 cells and in vitro differentiated hepatocytes in these bins were evaluated with a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Hypomethylated sites in up-regulated genes and hypermethylated sites in down-regulated genes were retained as key sites. A 1 000 bp region centered on each key site was divided into five 200 bp segments. Histone modification signals were calculated for each segment. DNA methylation differences and histone modification signal differences were used as features in the XGBoost classifier. We evaluated all 2 047 combinations of the 11 histone modifications and DNA methylation by five-fold cross-validation. We also constructed a co-regulation index. This index combined the change in each epigenetic feature with the direction and strength of its correlation with gene expression. The index values were converted to Z-scores. Regions with Z-scores above 0 were selected for further analysis. The stability of this classification was assessed by 1 000 bootstrap iterations. We then used RNA-seq and clinical data from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in TCGA to analyze genes whose promoters contained these regions. Univariate Cox regression, LASSO regression, and multivariable Cox regression were used to identify survival-associated candidate genes.Results We identified 4 676 differentially expressed genes. Among them, 1 537 genes were up-regulated and 3 139 genes were down-regulated in HepG2 cells relative to in vitro differentiated hepatocytes. The selected promoter bins had higher mean absolute methylation differences than the remaining bins in the up-regulated gene group (p=1.49×10-4). We identified 1 182 promoter hypomethylation sites in 495 up-regulated genes and 1 075 promoter hypermethylation sites in 1 083 down-regulated genes. Among the 11 histone modifications, the models combining DNA methylation with H3K27ac, H3K9ac, or H3K4me3 showed the highest predictive performance. A model containing these three histone modifications and DNA methylation achieved the AUC of 0.900 9. After the co-regulation index was added to the prediction model, the AUC increased from 0.900 9 to 0.928 7. A total of 882 regions with Z-scores above 0 were identified in the promoters of 322 genes. Bootstrap analysis showed a mean classification consistency of 99.38%. These genes were enriched in signal regulation, cell adhesion, tissue development, the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, and ECM-receptor interaction. Among the 322 genes, 43 genes were differentially expressed in TCGA hepatocellular carcinoma samples. Seven genes were associated with survival in univariate Cox analysis. FBXW10 and B3GALT2 were retained after LASSO and multivariable Cox analyses. The two-gene risk model achieved AUC values of 0.759, 0.834, and 0.914 for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival, respectively.Conclusion H3K4me3, H3K9ac, and H3K27ac showed the strongest co-regulation with DNA methylation in the hepatic cell models. The co-regulation index quantified the combined contribution of DNA methylation and histone modifications to gene expression changes. The incorporation of the co-regulation index increased the model AUC from 0.900 9 to 0.928 7. The index was used to identify key co-regulated regions. Further analysis with TCGA data identified FBXW10 and B3GALT2 as survival-associated candidate genes. These findings will be helpful for further analyzing and understanding the co-regulation of DNA methylation and histone modifications in cancer research.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

杜鹏宇,陈颖丽,李前忠,聂心浦,王俊,张璐强,李孟兰,张迪萌,赵媛媛.肝细胞系中DNA甲基化与组蛋白修饰协同调控指数的构建及应用分析[J].生物化学与生物物理进展,,():

复制
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-06-05
  • 最后修改日期:2026-08-21
  • 录用日期:2026-08-24
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-08-24
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码